Google

Layerwise partitioning, commonly known as tensor parallelism, is a multiple-GPU training strategy that splits the computational work within individual network layers across different devices. For example, instead of computing all channels of a convolutional layer on a single GPU, the workload can be distributed so that multiple GPUs each compute a fraction of the channels. This approach scales effectively in terms of computation and enables the processing of larger networks by pooling the memory of multiple GPUs. However, because each layer's computation depends on the aggregated results from all other participating GPUs, this strategy requires a massive number of synchronization barriers and incurs exorbitant bandwidth costs for data transfer.

Layerwise Partitioning

In the context of modern GPUs, tensor parallelism is implemented using a two-level, tile-based approach. At a high level, a large matrix multiplication is decomposed into smaller sub-matrix multiplications that can fit into the memory of a single GPU. At a lower level, these sub-problems are executed on the GPUs using tile-based parallel algorithms that are specifically optimized for the hardware architecture.

Two-Level Tile-Based Approach in Tensor Parallelism

A research team is training a model on a server with four GPUs, each with 24 GB of memory. They consistently encounter an 'out-of-memory' error. Profiling tools indicate that the error occurs during a single matrix multiplication involving a weight matrix that requires 26 GB of memory. Explain the specific parallelization technique designed to solve this problem and describe how it would distribute the computation across the four available GPUs.

Solving a Memory Bottleneck with Parallelism

A team is training a neural network with a very large linear layer, defined by the matrix multiplication `Y = XA`. The weight matrix `A` is too large to fit in the memory of a single GPU. The team proposes two different methods to distribute this single operation across two GPUs. Analyze both methods and determine which one correctly implements the strategy of splitting the matrix multiplication to overcome the memory limitation of the weight matrix. Justify your reasoning.

Analyzing Distributed Matrix Multiplication Strategies

An example of tensor parallelism can be observed in the Feed-Forward Network (FFN) sub-layer of a neural network model. Specifically, consider multiplying an input representation tensor, denoted as $$\mathbf{h} \in \mathbb{R}^{d}$$, by a large parameter matrix, denoted as $$\mathbf{W}_h \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times d_h}$$. To distribute this computation across multiple devices, the parameter matrix $$\mathbf{W}_h$$ can be sliced vertically into a sequence of $$M$$ smaller sub-matrices, represented mathematically as: $${}\mathbf{W}_h = \begin{bmatrix} \mathbf{W}_h^{1} & \mathbf{W}_h^{2} & \dots & \mathbf{W}_h^{M} \end{bmatrix}$$, where each sub-matrix $$\mathbf{W}_h^{k}$$ has a shape of $$d \times \frac{d_h}{M}$$. The input tensor $$\mathbf{h}$$ is then multiplied with each of these $$M$$ sub-matrices independently in parallel, and the resulting outputs are concatenated to form the final outcome.

Example of Tensor Parallelism in an FFN Sub-layer

A machine learning engineer is training a model with an exceptionally large layer. The weight matrix for this single layer is so large that it cannot fit into the memory of one GPU, causing an 'out-of-memory' error during the matrix multiplication step. Which of the following strategies directly addresses this specific memory bottleneck by parallelizing the problematic matrix multiplication itself across multiple devices?

Learn Before

Related