Learn Before
COVID-19 researchers need peer evaluation of research to acknowledge the gaps in our understanding of COVID-19 in order to promote more open research discourse and avoid discourse that prematurely tries to assess the validity of claims.
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
COVID-19 researches need to be able to easily find relevant and important papers among the mass influx of COVID papers in order to acquire more knowledge and advance their research.
COVID-19 researchers need claims to be scrutinized by qualified experts in order to spend less time and energy correcting misinformation or misleading information.
COVID-19 researchers need to be able to access COVID articles and their cited articles in order to conduct a more comprehensive review of the literature.
Learn After
The user RexxS on Wikipedia talks about the rapid increase in demand and supply of research articles is a subject of insufficient sourcing
Wikipedia user Sdkb points out that there needs to be a tool to update the stats automatically for accurate information and suggests a bot developed by John Hopkins as the solution
Kareem Carr on the Importance of Balanced Literature Reviews for Determining Scientific Consensus
Angela Rasmussen’s Claim That Focusing on Who Is “Right” Fuels the COVID-19 Infodemic
Prasad and Flier's Call for Civil Debate over COVID-19 Evidence