- Compliance-Focused Instruction
- Student Disengagement Patterns
- Suppressed Relational Capacity

Instructional Control Mechanisms - How teacher-directed practices create and maintain power imbalances

- Discursive Psychology as a "Sensitizing Frame"
- Dis/ability Notation
- Systematic Instruction Ideology

Theoretical Foundations - Core concepts framing the disability construction argument

Student disabilities were actively produced through language and interaction. Educational ideology played a central role in construction. Students were recognized for disability rather than humanity.

Disability as Constructed by Ideology

- Instructional Control Mechanisms - How teacher-directed practices create and maintain power imbalances
- Theoretical Foundations - Core concepts framing the disability construction argument
- Disability as Constructed by Ideology

State University of New York at Binghamton

This study uses Discursive Psychology to examine how disability is actively constructed through classroom interactions for students with significant intellectual disabilities. Three themes were found: compliance-focused instruction, student disengagement, and suppressed relational desires. The authors argue that ABA-rooted systematic instruction ideology produces disability rather than reveals it, recognizing students for deficits rather than humanity. An innovative mixed-method approach was used, but limited by field notes vs. video data.

Chapter 5: The Discursive Construction of Severe Dis/Ability in One School in the Southeastern United States

Lester, J. N. (Ed.). (2021). Discursive Psychology and Disability. Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Reference For: Discursive Psychology and Disability

- Discursive Psychology as a "Sensitizing Frame"
- Multimodal Discourse
- Post-Critical Ethnography
- Methodological Synthesis
- Field Notes Limitation

Research Design and Methods: The study's methodological approach, innovations, and constraints

Students with significant intellectual and developmental disabilities represent only 5% of all individuals with ID labels. They're dramatically under-represented in research. This population experiences unique educational contexts often in separate settings.

SIDD Population

Chapter 5 discusses students labeled with significant intellectual/developmental disabilities (SIDD). DP applications challenge positivist/limited conceptions of intelligence uncovering "disability as an ideology" through the micro-analysis of teacher/student interactions.

Response to D’Ardenne et al. (Chapter 5: Complex Support Needs)

- The Core Constraint (Structure vs. Impairment)
- The Critique (Agency & Practice)
- The Mechanism of "Communication" (The Outcome)

Learn Before

Related

Learn After