Learn Before
Examples Using GDP to Calculate National Economic Growth 1000-2000CE
History’s Hockey Stick: Stagnant Income Before Sustained Growth
Comparing GDP Per Capita Levels and Growth Rates Across Nations
Variability of the 'Hockey Stick' Growth Pattern Across Countries
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Pre-1800 GDP Data Scarcity and Its Impact on Historical Graphs
Data Sources for the History's Hockey Stick Graph
GDP Per Capita as a Measure of Average Living Standards
Fossil Fuel Combustion as a Driver of Modern Global Warming
Japan's Sharp 'Hockey Stick' Kink around 1870
Japan's economic takeoff is a distinct example of the 'hockey stick' growth pattern, characterized by a particularly sharp and late 'kink'. This period of rapid, sustained growth began around 1870, much later than in Britain, and featured a more abrupt upward trajectory in living standards.
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
The Economy 1.0 @ CORE Econ
Ch.1 The Capitalist Revolution - The Economy 1.0 @ CORE Econ
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
Ch.1 Prosperity, inequality, and planetary limits - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Latin American Growth
China's Economic Decline
India's Progress in Living Standards and Persistent Poverty (14th Century to Present)
Living Standards Visualization: Pre-1800 Limitations
Britain's Early and Gradual 'Hockey Stick' Kink
Catch-Up Growth of 'Latecomer' Economies: India and China
Britain's Long-Term Economic Growth (1600-1975)
Capitalism, Causation, and History’s Hockey Stick
Comparing GDP Levels and Growth Rates:
Pre-1800 GDP Data Scarcity and Its Impact on Historical Graphs
Data Sources for the History's Hockey Stick Graph
Wealth and Poverty Before the 'Hockey Stick' Kink
The Puzzle of the Hockey Stick: Why Stagnation Before Growth?
Dual Narrative of the GDP Hockey Stick: Growth and Stagnation
Economic Growth Rate
The Volatility of 'Hockey Stick' Economic Growth
An economic historian examines a graph of average income per person for Country X and Country Y over the last millennium. The graph shows that for centuries, both countries had very low, stagnant average incomes. Around the year 1750, Country X's average income began to increase sharply and has continued to grow since. Country Y's average income did not begin its sharp, sustained increase until around 1960. Today, Country X's average income is substantially higher than Country Y's. What does thi
Interpreting Historical Income Data
Consider a scenario where two drivers are on a wide, empty highway. Driver A chooses a speed based only on the legal speed limit and their personal comfort, and this choice does not affect the travel time of Driver B. Similarly, Driver B chooses a speed based on the same factors, and this choice does not affect Driver A's travel time. Which of the following modifications would be necessary to transform this situation into a social interaction?
Analyzing the 'Hockey Stick' Pattern of Economic Growth
Imagine a graph showing the average income per person for four countries (A, B, C, D) from the year 1500 to the present. For all four countries, the income line is flat and low until around 1800. After 1800, Country A's income line rises sharply. Country B's income line begins to rise sharply around 1900. Country C's income line begins a modest rise around 1950. Country D's income line remains flat and low throughout the entire period. Based on this information, which statement provides the most
An economic historian is studying two countries, Country A and Country B. Both countries experienced centuries of near-zero growth in average income. Around 1820, Country A's average income began to grow rapidly and has continued to do so. Country B's average income remained stagnant until around 1980, at which point it also began to grow rapidly. Based on this information, which of the following conclusions is most likely to be true about the economic situation of these two countries today?
Interpreting the 'Hockey Stick' Graph
The 'history's hockey stick' graph illustrates that the sharp, sustained increase in living standards began at approximately the same time for all major economies, leading to a synchronized global take-off.
Analyzing a Nation's Economic Trajectory
An economic historian creates a graph showing the historical path of average income for four hypothetical regions from the year 1000 to the present. All regions start with a long period of flat, low income. Match each region to the description that best fits its economic trajectory as described below.
- Region A: Income begins a steady, gradual rise around 1650.
- Region B: Income remains flat until around 1870, when it begins to rise very sharply.
- Region C: Income starts to grow
Analyzing the 'Hockey Stick' Pattern of Economic Growth
History’s Hockey Stick: Stagnant Income Before Sustained Growth
Intra-Country vs. Inter-Country Inequality in the 14th-17th Centuries
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)
Figure 1.1: The History's Hockey Stick Graph of GDP Per Capita
Modern Global Wealth Hierarchy (2018): Comparisons of Japan, India, Britain, US, and Norway
Understanding and Interpreting Ratio Scale Graphs
An economist plots the GDP per capita of two countries, Country X and Country Y, from 2000 to 2020 on a graph with a ratio scale on the vertical axis. In 2000, Country X had a much higher GDP per capita than Country Y. However, over the 20-year period, Country Y experienced a significantly faster average annual growth rate than Country X. Based on this information, which statement best describes how the two lines would appear on the graph?
Choosing the Right Economic Visualization
Consider two countries, Country A and Country B. In a given year, Country A's income per person is $40,000 and it increases by $2,000 the following year. In the same period, Country B's income per person is $10,000 and it increases by $1,000. Which of the following statements provides the most accurate economic comparison?
An economic historian is studying two countries, Alpha and Beta, over a 50-year period. She plots their income per person on a graph where the vertical axis uses a ratio scale. The line for Country Alpha starts at a much higher point on the axis than the line for Country Beta. Over the 50 years, the line for Alpha is nearly flat, while the line for Beta is a steep, upward-sloping straight line. What is the most accurate conclusion the historian can draw from this graph?
Evaluating an Economic Analysis
When examining a graph that plots a country's income per person over several decades using a ratio scale on the vertical axis, a straight, upward-sloping line signifies that the absolute (e.g., dollar amount) increase in income per person was constant year after year.
Evaluating an Investment Recommendation
Interpreting Economic Performance
An economic analyst is comparing two countries, Country A and Country B. In 1990, Country A's income per person was ten times that of Country B. Over the subsequent 30 years, Country A's income per person grew at an average rate of 1% per year, while Country B's grew at an average rate of 7% per year. Which of the following statements provides the most accurate analysis of their relative economic situations after this 30-year period?
An economic historian is comparing the long-term development of two nations, Country A and Country B, by plotting their income per person on a graph with a ratio scale on the vertical axis. Historical data reveals the following:
- Country A had a relatively high income per person 300 years ago and has experienced a slow but consistent proportional increase in income ever since.
- Country B had a very low income per person 300 years ago, which remained stagnant for the first 250 years, but has g
Delayed Economic Growth in China and India Until Post-Colonial Independence
Figure 3.7: Evolution of GDP per Capita Relative to the US (US = 100) at Purchasing Power Parity (2009–2023)
Delayed or Absent 'Hockey Stick' Growth in Some Countries
Hans Rosling's Video on Divergent National Progress in Health and Wealth
Impact of Resisting Foreign Intervention on Economic Growth: Japan vs. Britain (1600-1975)
Variability of Success in Capitalist Economies
Insufficiency of a Single Model for Explaining 'Hockey Stick' Growth
Learn After
An economic historian compares the long-run growth in average income for two nations. Nation A experienced a long period of economic flatness, followed by a gradual but sustained increase starting around the mid-17th century. Nation B also had a long period of flatness, but then experienced an exceptionally sudden and rapid acceleration of growth starting around the late 19th century. Which statement best analyzes the primary difference in the shape of these two 'hockey stick' growth patterns?
Identifying a National Economic Trajectory
Analysis of a Sharp Economic Takeoff
Match each country or region to the description that best characterizes its long-term historical pattern of economic growth in average income.
A nation's long-term economic growth path, characterized by centuries of near-zero growth followed by an extremely abrupt and rapid increase in average income beginning in the late 19th century, represents a fundamentally different economic phenomenon than the more gradual 'hockey stick' growth pattern that began elsewhere much earlier.
Characterizing a Rapid Economic Takeoff
An economic historian examines a graph of a country's average income from the year 1000 to 2000. The graph shows a long, flat line for nearly nine centuries, followed by an extremely sharp, near-vertical upward turn beginning around 1870. What does the sharpness of this upward turn most directly indicate about the country's economic transition?
Evaluating an Economic Historian's Claim
Imagine you are an economic historian analyzing a graph that shows the long-run average income for two countries. Country A's income shows a long period of flatness followed by a gradual, steady rise starting in the mid-17th century. Country B's income also shows a long flat period, but it is followed by an extremely sharp, almost vertical, upward turn beginning in the late 19th century. Which of the following historical examples does the pattern for Country B most closely resemble?
An economic historian is comparing the long-run growth in average income for two countries, both of which exhibit a 'hockey stick' pattern. Country X's growth began gradually around 1650. Country Y's growth began much later, around 1870, but was characterized by an extremely sharp and rapid upward turn. What is the most logical inference that can be drawn from the sharpness of Country Y's economic takeoff compared to Country X's?
Catch-Up Growth of 'Latecomer' Economies: India and China