Learn Before
Randomized name signals and interview callbacks in Boston and Chicago
In a 2001–2002 correspondence experiment, Bertrand and Mullainathan sent 4,870 fictitious résumés to selected newspaper job ads in Boston and Chicago, randomly assigning White-sounding or African-American-sounding names. Interview callback rates were 9.65% and 6.45%, respectively: a 3.20 percentage-point gap, approximately 50% relative to 6.45%. Randomization supports attributing the sampled contrast to assigned name signals; actual applicants’ racial identities were not manipulated. The outcome was a callback—not a completed interview, job offer, hiring, or earnings. Selected ads, occupational categories, cities, and period limit generalization; no current nationwide rate is established.
Source: https://sendhil.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Publication-52.pdf
0
1
Tags
Ch.13 Industrial-Organizational Psychology - Psychology @ OpenStax
Psychology @ OpenStax
OpenStax
OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Illegal Interview Questions
Examples of Protected Groups in Hiring
A restaurant is hiring a new head chef. The hiring manager reviews four finalists. Which of the following decisions is the clearest example of hiring discrimination?
A company is making a final hiring decision for a customer service representative role. Which of the following actions by the hiring manager is the clearest example of hiring discrimination?
Federal Legislation Prohibiting Employment Discrimination