University of California, Berkeley

- more than 50% of the articles are retracted within 1 year
- scientific misconduct takes longer to be retracted while administrative errors are corrected within 5 years or less
- 632 (64%) articles retracted because of ethical misconduct 
- 311 (31%) articles retracted because of scientific distortion
- 52 (5%) articles retracted because of administrative reasons or for reasons that did not fit the other two categories 
- citations and reads continue to increase after retraction (in the four years, there were more than 30% increase of citations)
- articles in the scientific distortion category receive more citations than other categories

Temporal characteristics of retracted articles results

Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2018). Temporal characteristics of retracted articles. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1771-1783. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-018-2802-y

Temporal characteristics of retracted articles

Temporal characteristics of retracted articles table

Growth in the number of citations and reads

Post retraction citation growth per category

Post retraction readership growth per category

Learn Before

Related